I’ve just watched this and feel compelled to update this blog: Lance Armstrong interviewed by the BBC

First thoughts? What a monumental bell-end Lance is. What a thoroughly unlikeable, devious prick. Repeatedly referring to himself in the third person, name-checking cancer survivors as a warped justification for his actions and exposed right at the end by some killer questions from Dan Roan.

But there’s still a small part of me that wonders whether cycling would be as popular without the Lance Armstrong story? Would I have heard about Mt Ventoux let alone be planning to climb it without Lance?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s